Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stephen Sokolyk's avatar

Agree totally with Joy Pullmann. The housewives when I was growing up (in the 70s) did the volunteer work and were a type of social glue. They raised money for charity, organized parties, helped at schools, etc. That is huge social capital that is lost with massive entry into the job market

Expand full comment
Joy Pullmann's avatar

I have many thoughts on this because it's a very personal topic for me (full-time working mom of six kids we don't put in daycare). You have some good thoughts here but I think you're missing some things.

One of those is the fact that women who are freed from the demands of paid labor can use -- and historically have used! -- that time in many productive ways that are not well compensated and cannot be, such as caring for the poor, or for other members of the family besides children. This is not only a massive potential social benefit but also a large benefit to a family -- who in old age wouldn't prefer to be cared for by one's own family rather than shuffled along between confusing and impersonal health providers? Who in time of prime-age sickness or trouble such as the aftermath of having a baby or suddenly coming down with cancer would not benefit significantly from an available helpful family member? Who in time of sadness or depression would not benefit from meals and conversations and participating in family life that can be offered by a woman who has a family life to offer people beyond her children?

The commercialization of these sorts of social functions, and the separation of them from family, has often meant that they simply are not done, or are done poorly. And the most vulnerable suffer as a result. And they have historically been offered as a service of love by women, who as a sex are much better suited to human care than men are as a whole. With women being diverted to full-time paid work, there are fewer and fewer people "keeping the lights on at home," not just in the intensive time of young children but also for any of the other MYRIAD significant needs that come up among an extended family in a normal life cycle.

It's because I spend a significant amount of my time in paid work that I am able to see what is not being done because of that major time commitment. Yes, I get huge intellectual stimulation and satisfaction from my job. But it's key to be careful that this personal satisfaction is not coming at the cost of the needs of those I owe care and support -- namely my children, husband, sisters, brothers, father and mother, not to mention my church family.

This is just one thing I think you're missing in your analysis -- the fact that the "housewife" model is not at ALL about "being home to clean and cook with the messy little kids." It's about being a nexus and offerer of massive social capital to those you love. Being able to do that ON DEMAND requires flexibility and freedom that is very hard to square with a full-time job.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts