Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sheluyang Peng's avatar

I see modern society as too fractured to really have any universal figure of condemnation. Even Hitler and the Nazis will lose their power, especially as the global Left increasingly makes Palestine the central symbol of their movement. Leftists know that sympathy for Zionism is in large part due to the Holocaust, so they don’t want to bring Hitler up too much anymore. Younger Democrats and others on the global left are almost entirely anti-Zionist.

Meanwhile, you have some people on the Right like Darryl Cooper (Martyr Made) saying that Hitler wasn’t really the bad guy in World War II. So I don’t think Hitler can play the role of Satan for long.

Expand full comment
Spouting Thomas's avatar

On the Gerwig/Netflix Narnia thing:

I'm trying to think -- in the history of media, has there EVER been a successful project like this? Create a work that subverts and perverts the original and extends a middle finger to all of its fans, yet is still a success?

It at least seems like it's almost always a bad bet. After all, if you want to tell an original story, why not just tell an original story? What's the point of using a familiar brand if its only effect will be to antagonize its existing fans? It's one thing to never produce anything besides reboots, prequels, and sequels of stories that you love -- but of stories that you hate? I get why unhappy people writing fanfic as a hobby late at night might choose to write hate-adaptations, but why does Hollywood keep giving them a budget?

The closest I can think of to a subversive project succeeding is "Wicked" (the play, which I think the movie adapts straightforwardly). But there are several important respects in which it is different from the various other subversion/perversion adaptations, which is probably why it succeeds.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts